Another Australian-owned Formula 1 team

This article was written by Barry Lake and was published in Motor Racing Australia 85, April/May 2005.

It’s a long way from a done deal, but most of the pieces are in place for a brand new Formula 1 teamto join the circus. And the man behind it is still-young Australian engineerwho has worked his way up from our local Formula Ford series, as Barry Lake reports.

Mark Preston isn’t an as-tough-as-nails businessman in the mould of ProDrive’s David Richards, who until recently held the reins at BAR-Honda, or Tom Walkinshaw, who owned the Arrows Formula 1 team, or even Minardi’s Australian owner, Paul Stoddart, for that matter.

Neither is he a sometime racer turned single-minded team owner like Frank Williams or Eddie Jordan. If you had to liken Preston to any one of the very individualistic F1 team owners, you might start with Ron Dennis. But then, that isn’t him, either.

What you start to realise is that none of these men is like another. They all are individuals with little in common other than that single-mindedness and a passion for Formula 1 motor racing.

This clean-cut, quietly-spoken 36 year-old Australian engineer has his sights set on emulating, in his own way, the career of McLaren’s Ron Dennis, who worked his way up from being a race mechanic to owning one of the most successful Formula 1 teams in the sport’s history.

Motor Racing Australia – No. 85

But he wants to add a bit of Ferrari to the blend, as well. Preston believes that people are what an F1 team is all about, but they have to more than just the best at what they do, they also need to be happy in their work, and focussed on their jobs, rather than on internal politics. Although his background is in engineering, Mark now is studying business at Oxford, the highest ranked business school in the United Kingdom and among the best in the world, at the same time as he is pulling together his team.

This isn’t just a pipe dream. Preston already has all the key people lined up, some ready to go, some already working with him. He has been mentally noting the people he wants to have around him throughout the years he has been in F1. And he has the option of moving into an already-established – and currently unused – purpose-built F1 factory. All he needs is the financial backing.

That’s the hardest part, although Preston already has some experienced financial people on board and he is working tirelessly, scouring the entire world for a company that can really benefit from the exposure they would get by backing an F1 team.

Getting a spot on the F1 grid isn’t a problem. The series was structured, years ago, around having a grid of 24 cars – a total of 12, two-car teams. At the moment there are only 10 teams, that’s 20 cars, racing. F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone has been waiting for years for someone to come along and fill the extra two spots.

MRA 85, Another Aussie F1 Team?

Last year, when Preston first decided to go for it, he could see three rivals already vying for the two spots. Since then, they have been removed from the equation completely, because all three have moved into existing teams. One, a Russian business man, has joined forces with Carlin Motorsport and purchased the Jordan F1 team. Another, the Austrian owner of the Red Bull sports drink company, has bought what was the Jaguar team. And Christian Horner, the 31-year-old who was well advanced with plans for a team of his own, has accepted the job as team manager for the new Red Bull F1 team.

That’s not to say that new rivals won’t spring up out of the woodwork in the near future. But, for the moment at least, Mark Preston’s is the only group (as far as he knows) currently working towards creating a new F1 team, and there are two spots up for grabs. His operations manager is Kevin Lee, who joined TWR in 1979 and was general manager through their Le Mans-winning Silk Cut Jaguar days. He later was responsible for sorting out financial problems at Benetton and Arrows F1 teams and took part in the formation of the Toyota F1 team.

Michael Boon, finance and business services, also was with the TWR Jaguar program and was in F1 for eight years with Benetton (now Renault).

Chief designer Paul Bowen has 17 years experience in F1, originally as chief designer at Arrows, later head of mechanical research at Ferrari, on both occasions working directly with Ferrari’s current technical director, Ross Brawn.

Composites design is taken care of by Dr Robert Neumann, who was a design engineer at Arrows, and now has his own company.

Brand development is in the hands of Paul Balaam, who has 20 years in the marketing industry in UK, Europe and USA.

Warwick Marx, who provides strategic management consultancy, has had a 15 year career with companies in USA and Australia in professional engineering and business management.

Other key personnel can not be named because they are currently working in other jobs until needed by Preston Racing on a full-time basis.

Preston has assembled a team that is poised and ready to take on any project and already the team has worked on some racing projects. They can take on anything right up to a full F1 attack at short notice, depending on what a financial backer wishes to achieve.

They are constantly monitoring the Fl situation to keep pace with developments, but Preston realises that a backer might want to try something a little less daunting before launching into F1. To this end, and having members on the team who have twice been on the winning team in the Le Mans 24 Hour Race, they have analysed the requirements for winning the race again. It is possible, says Preston, but no pushover. A serious attack on Le Mans would have to be a three year project, he says.

Realising that Preston Racing as yet has no real track record as a company, Mark knows they might have to do something spectacular to demonstrate their capabilities. The team has designed what they call the Preston Racing Track Car, or PR-TC for short, a “new technologies demonstrator”. They are keeping the design under wraps at the moment, planning to save the visual impact until the time is right for maximum exposure for any company that might wish to back the project.

The Preston Racing team: Mark Preston, Michael Boon, Kevin Lee, Dr Rob Neumann, Paul Balham.

But we can tell you that the track car is based on a Formula 1 car (a one-year old car, which they would buy from one of the teams) with full sports car bodywork, and the plan would be to attack the long-standing outright lap record for the world famous original North Loop of the Nurburgring road circuit in Germany. After that, it could be a show car, displayed world wide at motor shows and racing car and engineering shows, to promote both the sponsor and Preston Racing.

While undertaking all of this and searching for companies that can benefit from their involvement with Preston Racing, Mark spends one week in every two months studying for a Master of Business Administration degree at Oxford Business School. It has the dual benefit of developing Mark’s already impressive business skills, as well as putting him in the company of a lot of important people in big business from all over the world who are there to prepare themselves for the final move to upper level management. Many of them, including some of the lecturers – are excited and enthused by Preston’s plans.

Mark Preston can’t put his finger on exactly what triggered his interest in motor sport. He remembers that, as a young boy, he always used to watch the big Bathurst touring car race on TV every year, and that his grandfather, who owned a motor wrecking business, was “into cars”.

Mark also says his appetite was whetted by this writer’s stories in Modern MOTOR in the late 1980s of our Datsun 1600 club motor sport car. He told us, “I actually went out and bought a Datsun 1600, although I never got around to competing in it.” His main interest was in the engineering side, so he concentrated on completing his school studies and following this with a mechanical engineering course at Monash University in Melbourne.

“I found the uni course was very theoretical and, although I obviously wanted to learn the theory, I was anxious to get some practical experience,” remembers Preston. So he asked around the sport if anyone could steer him towards someone in Australia who was building his own racing cars. He was directed to Mike Borland, designer and manufacturer of Spectrum Formula Ford racing cars.

It was 1988 and Borland had built one Spectrum 04, but was busy race engineering a Formula Holden for Mark Skaife, who won the Australian Drivers’ Championship that year.

“When I first went to see Michael and told him I wanted to design racing cars, he gave me some chassis information and told me to go away and draw up some roll centres. So I went home and did that and went back with them the next day. He looked surprised when he saw me, and said, “Oh; you’re back again. Most people don’t come back…”

So Mark was on the team – part time. A customer had bought one of Borland’s cars and Borland ran it for him at race meetings, with Mark as one of his crew. As well as helping at the race meetings, Mark was given various projects by Mike to work on, largely those that could benefit from the time Mark was prepared to put in on the computer.

Being keen and inventive, during the period that Borland was designing his Spectrum 05, Mark would come up with various ideas of his own and go back to Mike saying, “Hey, what about this…” and Mike would, more often than not, reply, “We’ve tried that; it doesn’t work.

Mark even wrote his own computer simulation program, so he could simulate what a car would do around a circuit with certain modifications to its set-up. Then, when the car was tested at the track, if it did better or worse than the simulation suggested, he would have a direction in which to head in a quest to learn why the changes did or didn’t work.

He called the program Dynamic Response and has continued to update it and still offers it via his web site today.

Preston finished his university degree in 1991 and eventually took a job as project engineer at Holden Special Vehicles. As well as working on various projects for HSV, he also was drafted in to do some for Holden – including adapting a two litre engine to the Holden Commodore intended for sale in South-East Asia. He continued to work with Borland on the side, and went with him to the race meetings.

But Mark wanted to be full-time in the business of designing and building racing cars. By 1995 he realised that Borland wasn’t going to sell enough Formula Fords in Australia – against the then top-selling British Van Diemen cars – to be able to employ Mark full time. So he put together a proposal and set off to Malaysia to try to sell the motor sport people there on the idea of starting a series by buying Spectrum Formula Fords.

The man he was directed to talk to was the father of the yet-to-be racing driver Alex Yoong, then a wealthy real estate developer and a big wheel in Malaysian motor sport circles. But Mr Yoong was unimpressed with a proposal from an Australian manufacturer who had built only a few cars and hadn’t yet won anything of note. He implied that if Mark was representing a European manufacturer with a good track record, he might be interested.

Mark decided then and there that he would have to go to England if he wanted to be a racing car designer on the scale that he was envisaging.

“When I said to Michael I was going to go to England we talked about it and decided, ‘Let’s do one more year and do everything we’ve talked about; own the car ourselves; run the team ourselves.’ So we went halves in the cost of the car, and we got Jason Bargwanna as the driver

That was 1996 and Jason finished second in the championship, behind David Besnard.” At the Oran Park round of that series, Preston was talking to the writer of this story and said he was planning on going to England, did I have any ideas on who he should be talking to about a job, where to live and other such things.

I had only a little earlier been talking to experienced race engineer, recently returned to Australia, Bruce Cary and suggested that he would know. I found Bruce, introduced him to Mark and Bruce said, “How old are you?” Mark told him he was 27, he would be 28 in a couple of months, and asked why he wanted to know.

Bruce said, “If you’re less than 28 years old you can get a two year working visa for Britain, but once you’ve turned 28 they don’t want to know you. “Mark fired into action the next day. Over the next few weeks he organised his visa, gave his notice at HSV, and soon was on his way. He arrived in England on the 26th of October 1996, 12 days before his 28th birthday.

At about the same time Chris Dyer, an electronics engineer with the Holden Racing Team and a friend of Mark’s, also was considering going to England. Their impending departure inspired Blake Arrowsmith, then building engines at HRT, to follow suit. Dyer now is race engineer with Michael Schumacher at Ferrari, so has a few world championships under his belt, and Arrowsmith now is an engineer in the engine department at Toyota F1 in Cologne.

But back then, in late-1996, they all scored jobs at the Arrows Formula 1 team. It was coincidental that Tom Walkinshaw, who owned Holden Special Vehicles, had just bought Arrows. The real reason they got in at Arrows was that Walkinshaw moved it tonew premises in a different area and some of the staff decided not to stay on, and Tom was planning on increasing the staff anyway so, as luck would have it, there were plenty of jobs on offer just as the Aussie trio arrived on the scene.

Mark worked for Arrows for six years, beginning in stress engineering, which he did for a year, and he then became ‘senior vehicle performance analyst’.

“That was a position created for me, rally. I had asked if we could do vehicle dynamics in the stress analysis department. I wanted to carry on with simulation, so I was put in charge of that. For the last eight months that I was there I was head of R&D and of the test team as well. R & D covered almost everything from stress analysis to vehicle dynamics, and the laboratories, which included the four-post rigs, gearbox rigs, and crash testing. So they put the test team in with R&D, and we effectively had the whole area. It was a good set-up, really; very efficient. The test team mechanics, when they were not away testing, could help out on the test rigs etc. It was great fun; I had so much variety there. I loved every minute of it.”

But then Tom Walkinshaw got into financial trouble and Arrows was caught up in the bankruptcy of most of his group of companies. Mark was “shattered”. “That job was everything that I had always wanted to do. And it was better than it could have been in a bigger team. Arrows didn’t have as much money as the big teams, so we went away testing only half as often as the rest of them did. So we didn’t travel as much, but what it meant was that we spent a lot of time back at the factory, and we had the time to do research there that we couldn’t have done if we’d been away testing all the time. It was the perfect loop.

“The first year that we did it that way, I thought it was a lot more efficient than when we had done twice the test miles the previous year. And when we did go away testing, with just one car instead of two, and with only four test days available, we were more focussed, and more organised. Arrows had a computer simulation program that was great for combining the test results with what we learned back at the factory.”

It was about August 2002 that the team collapsed and disappeared from the Fl grids. Mark had seen it coming and had begun looking around and going for job interviews. He started with McLaren only 16 days after he left Arrows – and that break was only to comply with legal requirement in my contract.

His first job at McLaren was “principle designer, structures”. “I dropped quite a bit in the breadth of the work I was doing. It involved composite design, stress analysis, crash testing, and the laboratory (four-post rigs). It was still fairly broad, but not the complete loop I’d had at Arrows.

“I was at McLaren from August 2002 to June 2004, slightly less than two years. I left, in the end, mainly because, after everything went wrong with the MP4-18 car in 2003, they changed everything within the organisation. Everyone’s jobs were broken down a lot more. When I first went there they wanted to have four principle designers, but now they divided it between eight designers. At that point I decided McLaren wasn’t the place for me for the rest of my life.

“At McLaren you’re just a cog in a huge machine. If I was English and I had a wife and kids and a mortgage and just wanted a job to pay the bills, I think I could have learned to be content with the situation there. But I wanted to go further than that. I could see that I would never be technical director at McLaren, in charge of the whole thing. And yet it was one of the biggest and best teams in the business. There was nowhere else to go – nowhere that would have the situation or possibilities I was after, anyway. I had reached a point where I could either go back to Australia – and I couldn’t think of anything there that I really wanted to do – or I could get on with something else that was going to offer me the challenge and the fun that I was looking for.

That “something else” was to start a Formula 1 team of his own.

As Mark says, “I am pretty much hooked on F1, because it is the pinnacle of motor racing.” It is his confidence, his total lack of doubt, that reminds you of a young Frank Williams, a Ron Dennis, or an Eddie Jordan – all of whom started with nothing and built their own F1

Asked if he is in any way daunted by the prospect, Preston answers, “No, not really. If it’s the same as everything else I have done along the way, it shouldn’t be too much of a problem. Everything else I’ve done has been just a matter of keeping on bashing away at it until it happens.”

Driving Autonomous Innovation: Mark Preston Discusses StreetDrone’s Progress at Cenex Expo

Mark Preston of StreetDrone shared exciting advancements at the Cenex Expo. He detailed future plans in vehicle autonomy. These plans focus on industrial and logistics environments. The conversation centered on StreetDrone’s successful work at Nissan’s Sunderland plant. The company transitioned from their 5GCal project to a newly funded endeavor. This new project is focused on scaling and commercialisation.

Scaling Autonomy in Real-World Industrial Settings

Preston highlighted that StreetDrone is expanding its autonomous fleet from initial trials to four operational trucks within the Nissan facility. These trucks are tasked with moving goods throughout the site. The real innovation, according to Preston, lies in targeting environments like factories and ports. This includes upcoming deployments at the Port of Rotterdam. These environments have private roads and controlled speeds, which allow for faster, safer commercialization of autonomous technology.

From Proof of Concept to Commercialization

The proven success at Nissan opened doors for StreetDrone to secure new projects abroad. Preston emphasized that areas like industrial logistics and port operations are the most immediate opportunities. They are viable and revenue-generating in terms of autonomy. This places StreetDrone among the UK’s leading players in this space.

Collaborating for Scale and Future Growth

The interview concluded with Preston stressing the importance of partnerships, industry collaboration, and continued outreach. StreetDrone is engaging with potential customers at events like Cenex. They also connect with industry supply chain partners. By doing so, StreetDrone is positioning itself at the forefront of commercializing autonomous vehicle technology for logistics. They are also focusing on industrial use cases.


Navigating Speed, Strategy & Innovation in Motorsport and Beyond

Featured

In this in-depth conversation, Mark Preston discusses his career at the forefront of motorsport and mobility innovation. He talks about his engineering roles at Arrows and McLaren. He also discusses founding Super Aguri F1, winning titles in Formula E, and pioneering autonomous vehicle technology at Oxa. The discussion explores leadership, strategy, marginal gains, AI, and building high-performance teams.

Conversation Highlights

In a wide-ranging discussion, Mark reflects on a career defined by pushing the boundaries of engineering, leadership, and innovation. His journey spans from the racetrack to autonomous technology. He began as a simulation and stress engineer in Australia. Later, he moved to the UK to pursue his Formula 1 dream. He eventually worked with Arrows and McLaren. A turning point came when he shifted from pure engineering to business leadership. He founded Super Aguri F1. He later achieved championship success in Formula E with DS Automobiles and now Lola & Yamaha. Throughout, the constant has been a deep commitment to learning, experimentation, and building high-performing teams.

Motorsport is an unparalleled arena for decision-making under pressure. Mark highlights that performance is tested every two weeks. Even small wins, like optimising pit stops or improving team communication, compound into success. Drawing from experience at McLaren, he emphasises the importance of institutional memory. He stresses the need for scientific rigour and structured processes over black art intuition. He also discusses how strategic clarity is critical in racing. Iteration is also vital. Scenario planning helps build resilient, innovative organisations across sectors.

Beyond motorsport, Mark shares insights from his leadership at Oxa. He is applying engineering knowledge to autonomous vehicles in ports and logistics. His focus remains on practical, scalable use cases — leveraging off-highway environments and deep software integration. AI and machine learning reshape both racing and autonomy. Mark combines technical depth with organizational clarity in his approach. He continually strives to stay on the “bleeding edge” where no one has the answers — yet.

Key Timestamps

  • 00:00 – Introduction & career overview
  • 04:15 – Lessons from McLaren & Arrows
  • 10:30 – Leadership in high-pressure environments
  • 17:45 – Marginal gains & small wins
  • 27:20 – Transition to autonomous vehicles
  • 38:10 – AI & machine learning in motorsport
  • 47:00 – Scenario planning & strategy

Follow My Work

To keep up with my latest work in motorsport, autonomous vehicles, and innovation, connect with me on LinkedIn or explore more projects at www.MarkAndrewPreston.com.


Mark Preston on the Rise of Formula E: A Chat with the CEO of DS TECHEETAH

In a recent interview, Mark Preston, CEO of DS TECHEETAH Formula E team, shared insights into the world of electric Motorsport and the strategies driving its growing popularity. From its unique approach to fan engagement to its commitment to sustainability, Formula E is carving out a distinct identity in the racing world.

From Engineering Roots to Leading a Formula E Team

Preston’s journey in Motorsport began with a hands-on approach during his engineering degree. He started by manufacturing motor racing cars and working with Formula Fords. Encouraged to join F1, he moved to the UK and worked his way up at Arrows Grand Prix and McLaren before starting his own Formula 1 team with Aguri Suzuki and Honda. This diverse experience paved the way for his leadership role in Formula E.

Formula E: Racing Reimagined

Formula E distinguishes itself from Formula 1 in several key ways:

  • Electric Power: As the only fully electric racing sport, Formula E champions sustainability.
  • Urban Landscapes: Races occur on city centre street circuits, bringing the action to fans.
  • Sustainability Focus: Formula E is the first sport to be Net Zero since its beginning, offsetting all logistics and emissions.
  • Fan Engagement: Innovative features like Fan Boost and Attack Mode create an interactive and exciting experience for viewers.

Fan Engagement: Getting Closer to the Action

DS TECHEETAH employs several strategies to build and maintain fan engagement:

  • Behind-the-Scenes Access: Allowing increased filming in pit lanes and garages.
  • Fan Boost: Enabling fans to vote for their favourite driver and give them a temporary power boost.
  • Attack Mode: Introducing a gaming element with strategic power boosts.
  • Experimentation: Embracing new ideas to enhance the fan experience.
  • Focus on Experience: Creating excitement and helping fans understand the drivers’ and teams’ stress levels.
  • Social Media: Using platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn to connect with fans on different levels.
  • Esports Partnerships: Collaborating with partners like Marley to engage fans through Esports.

Sustainability: A Core Value

Formula E’s commitment to sustainability is evident in its Net Zero status and efforts to reduce single-use plastics. This resonates with a younger audience that is increasingly conscious of environmental issues. The series also attracts sponsors who want to align with green initiatives and tell stories about electric vehicles and renewable energy.

Looking to the Future

Preston envisions a future where Formula E continues to lead the way in sustainable Motorsport. He highlights the importance of thinking five to ten years ahead to shape the future of electric car technology and fan experience. By experimenting with new formats and technologies, Formula E aims to remain at the forefront of innovation and continue to excite fans.

How to become an F1 Technical Director

🚀 Thrilled to share my journey in motorsport through the “How to Become an F1 Technical Director” interview. I reflected on my transition from a mechanical engineer in Australia. This journey led me to work with some of the top teams in Formula 1 and Formula E. It has been an incredible experience.

The key takeaways for anyone pursuing a motorsport career are important. 💡 Specialization matters—find what you’re passionate about and excel in it.
💡 Adaptability is crucial—the road is rarely straight, but you can navigate the twists and turns with the right mindset.
💡 Don’t be afraid to take risks. The opportunities that seem uncertain may shape your career the most.

I started my journey with Arrows Grand Prix. Then, I worked with McLaren Racing. Now, I am leading at Lola Cars. I’ve learned that persistence and passion are key ingredients to success. Excited to see what’s next as we gear up for another exciting Formula E season! ⚡

#Motorsport #Formula1 #FormulaE #Leadership #CareerAdvice #Engineering #Innovation #F1TechnicalDirector


Lucas di Grassi and Zane Maloney exit pit lane in the São Paulo race with Lola Yamaha ABT Formula E Team

Move the Ball: Mark Preston, Pushing the Boundaries in Motorsports and Beyond

Move the Ball: Mark Preston, Pushing the Boundaries in Motorsports and Beyond.

Mark Preston’s illustrious career in motorsports is a testament to his passion, innovation, and leadership. From his early beginnings in Australia, where he developed a love for cars while working on a farm, to his groundbreaking achievements in Formula 1 with Arrows Grand Prix and McLaren, Preston has consistently pushed the boundaries of engineering and technology.

His entrepreneurial spirit led to the rapid establishment of the Super Aguri Formula 1 team, built from scratch in just 100 days. Transitioning to Formula E, Preston played a pivotal role in its inception, leading Team Aguri and DS TECHEETAH to multiple championships. Now, as the Motorsport Director at Lola Cars, he continues to drive innovation with a focus on sustainability, underscored by a new partnership with Yamaha for Formula E.

Mark Preston’s journey is a remarkable blend of technical expertise and visionary leadership, making him a significant figure in the evolution of motorsports.

Communication and the Use of LLMs in Motorsports

In 1999, during my tenure as Head of R&D at Arrows Grand Prix, I embarked on a journey to enhance the performance of our F1 cars. At that juncture, genetic algorithms emerged as the preferred tool, particularly in fast trading software. Despite operating on Silicon Graphics visual workstations, which were relatively powerful but nothing like what is available nowadays, we could conduct many runs. We employed these algorithms primarily to analyse tyre models and seek other optimisation strategies. Interestingly, the learning often highlighted inaccuracies within our models. For instance, a particular simulation model would consistently suggest a 100% front weight on the car, indicating an error in the model that may have caught out a few teams over the years with unrealistic targets! These were the early days of using computers with limited power and brute force algorithms.


When I moved to McLaren F1, I was astounded by the wealth of “embedded knowledge” the team possessed, a term used in MBA circles to mean that they’ve meticulously documented everything. To make this vast reservoir of knowledge more easily accessible to new engineers, I considered implementing an “on-prem” Google server. The idea was that little nuggets of wisdom only known to a few people could be shared across the company. The idea is that knowledge, when harnessed collaboratively, can be greater than the sum of its parts. Now, imagine if we could enhance the learning model of ChatGPT by incorporating this internal knowledge derived from over three decades of racing expertise into speeding up the dissemination of knowledge and ideas (the first version of this article was prepared in May 2023, MS Co-Pilot and Google’s Bard are solving precisely this at the moment).


Fast forward to the Super Aguri F1 team. Our radios were not at the level of the other teams, so we decided to experiment with increasing the quality of our communication with the drivers. We agreed that one solution was to move the pitwall engineering (prat perch) to the air-conditioned, quiet, controlled environment of the engineering truck behind the pits. This increased the communication quality and was a precursor to thinking more about the now standard “Mission Controls” back at base in F1 and FE, where engineers can work in a quieter controlled environment. This decoupling of tasks is a powerful concept. Obviously, “you can’t hammer a nail over the internet,” so specific tasks need to stay on the ground, at the track, but many jobs can be done remotely.


The result was the now famous run in between Anthony Davidson and a beaver while running 3rd at the Montreal Grand Prix in 2007. With engineers positioned in the truck behind the pit garages and Anthony having to dive into the pits at the last minute, the mechanics were left surprised as the TV talked about him coming into the pitlane! An example of the right intent, but not the right outcome!

Another solution to our communication problem was to think about texting. I saw the Technical Director of F1, Charlie Whiting, in Monaco on the morning of the F1 race to discuss solutions. Car communications are restricted to radio, but I argued that if our driver had had a hearing impairment, that would not be entirely fair, hence the need for text-based communications. Charlie agreed to look at a proposal. We never did implement the concept due to the requirement to redesign the steering wheel, but I have continued to think about communications and ideas that might solve problems.


Since I started looking at genetic algorithms in 1999, rapid advances in computing power, including GPUs and TPUs, enabled machine learning to evolve significantly. This computational growth allowed for training complex models on large datasets, leading to powerful AI like GPT-3 and GPT-4 and ushering in a new era of AI innovation. The astonishing rise of ChatGPT and large language models or LLMs is the latest thing and is changing by the week, if not the day at the moment (this article will be out of date by the time you read it potentially, first written May 2023!).


Could the LLM be trained on a smaller data set and more clearly communicate with a driver? My current understanding of these LLMs is that the better “prompt engineering” fed into the model, with the best context, the better the answers and the more concise the results. If you notice that when you type in a question to Bing now, it first makes the prompt more straightforward, then feeds it to the model. The more you narrow down the context, the better the answer. Here’s a simple example:
Me on the prompt line: “Please write a concise radio communication for an F1 driver with bad radio quality to ask them to come into the pit lane for new tyres.”


ChatGPT4: “Box, box, box. Tyres ready. Confirm, over.”


A silly, small example, but it shows how it can be used. I have seen many times in the heat of battle where we engineers make mistakes. The more scenario planning and fast decision-making possible, the fewer mistakes.
For example, ChatGPT could prepare radio communications and pop-up ideas for a race engineer based on preconceived knowledge from listening to “Mission Control” conversations or info coming from the TV!


These are only simple examples, and every day, I am sure you will all think of more. And by the time this article comes out, more API integrations, private learning model implementation and a host of tools have become available. I will watch with interest how this all begins to play out and would love to hear any ideas from engineers!


PS: this article was written with the aid of ChatGPT4

Winning ways in Buenos Aires

Wow, what a weekend! Amlin Aguri’s first win in the FIA’s first fully electric championship! It is an amazing feeling to get a result after all the work put in by the team over the last three years.

“Luck is when opportunity meets preparation.”

Plus it takes a lot of work to start a new team in a completely new championship – but it’s worth it when all the effort is rewarded! Many people have asked what we did to get to the front, what has changed, how did we do it?

The build up to the race win really started after all of our troubles in Punta del Este.

The series test, on the Sunday after the Punta race, was the first time that Antonio (Felix de Costa) and Salvador (Duran) really had a chance to test the car after Antonio had missed much of the pre-season testing and the first race in Beijing with BMW DTM duties. This, coupled with the fact that race weekends are so short which restricts running, means that when you haven’t got the car in the “zone” it is extremely difficult to do anything meaningful with regard to setup or finding solutions.

Our race pace has been quick from the beginning with Takuma setting the fastest lap in Beijing. So what we were looking for was time to get a proper qualifying setup and thereby increase our race pace accordingly. You must remember that if we hadn’t had an issue during the pit stop in Malaysia, then Antonio could have finished in the top five and potentially on the podium. The engineers worked over the break between Beijing and Putrajaya and then over Christmas before Punta to get our models and understanding of the car to a point that we could validate this understanding during the Punta test. The result was a fastest first sector on the final run of the day before a Red Flag which showed that we were going in the right direction for the next race in Buenos Aires.

Antonio arrived in BA with a quietly confident attitude focussed on making the best of our great Punta test and determined to have a great weekend: everyone arriving on a high and following through is a good indicator of the picture of the weekend.

So how did the weekend go? Well in Free Practice 1 the car was quick straight of the box. There was good work carried out during the session, getting everything done that was on the plan; another good step. Some cars were running maximum qualifying power; hence the large gap at the front of the pack but P9 was respectable, showing of potential to come.

Then in FP2, it was maximum at- tack, our final preparation before qualifying and we were immediately quick with our final position of P3 only 0.4s off the leader which showed that our ultimate potential for qualifying and race performance was within reach.

Qualifying is always a lottery. Antonio drew Q1 while Salvador was in Q3. The elusive Q4 without red or yellow flags is the name of the game with a rubbered-in track and potentially better track temperatures, but we made the most of the quicker car and got ourselves in the top 10. Antonio felt it was better to aim for a top 10 position and wait to see how things went in the race instead of necessarily going for pole and having a problem. Starting P7, 0.5s from pole position showed again that we were in the right place for the race.

The race was quite chaotic, but Antonio and Salvador drove sensibly, both overtaking a number of drivers and making the best of battles going on around them. As the race went on we had a great pit stop which resulted in gaining positions for Antonio and a safety car which caused some confusion with everyone waiting for the screens to update with the final order to be clear.

As we moved up the leader board it became more and more stressful for everyone in the garage as there was more to lose with each increment Antonio gained! By the time he was in a podium position, the tension was showing on everyone’s faces! And as each problem happened on track we were increasingly on the edge of our seats! Salvador was also making up places and looked like he would get into the points as well.

At that stage we could see that Antonio had plenty of battery life left over and
he was therefore in a great position to push all the way to the end of the race and catch Nick Heidfeld before the chequered flag. When the drive-through came for Nick we almost couldn’t believe it, we just had to hold our breath and bite our nails till the end of the race.

Some people might say that there was some luck involved, but you can bring up many old adages about finishing first that you must first finish, and that goes for every element of the car, our team work, the car setup, the drivers’ management of the car’s batteries, the control systems, our pit stop practice and also how the other teams run their cars. Every part of a team is important and we have proven in previous races that we too could have technical problems such as electronic control systems with Takuma at the first race and pit stop problems that cause issues.

Were we lucky?

Luck is when opportunity meets preparation,and we certainly had the pace to take the opportunities delivered to us over the weekend.

Whats next? Miami, where we should make some improvement on all aspects of the team operation, the car setup, our race strategy and some driver training. We have the pace and now it is a matter of building on success and doing a better job at each race and chipping away at the championship points to move ourselves up the grid. After all we love a challenge; otherwise we wouldn’t have entered such a unique and brand new championship!

Following my last column I have been very interested in the questions that we are being asked in our pre-race press conferences, especially at Buenos Aires where they are big fans of motorsport. One of the most common topics was, ‘how will the technology find its way into the world?’ The best example I could see was the bus rapid transit system they have in the city which is a great example of where electric drive, regenerative systems and wireless charging will find its way quickly into practical everyday applications.

You should remember that Uruguay generates 45% of their electricity from hydro
with a target of 90% in 2015 coming from renewables. The intermittent nature of some renewables will benefit from the “Energy Cloud” that will be created when more electric vehicles connect to the network and allow off line storage in the night for solar and during low wind conditions for wind.

Reprinted from Mark Preston’s column Racing to the Future in Motorsport Monday

Formtech launches the E1 research concept EV

Formtech created a vision of EV when they launched the E1 atFrankfurt’s IAA Motorshow in September.  The research study provides the base for a number of concepts in lightweighting technology using composites, high-end materials and machining.

Formtech’s EV started out as a concept for the companies CEO Franz Hilmer, “I wanted to develop a car that would provide me with a second vehicle that I can use to commute to work, but be stylish and provide the basis to exploit the technologies that Formtech is developing in lightweight materials, high-end precision manufacturing and other technologies.”

Designers: Satoshi Nakamura, Tomas Beres, and Rafael Gross, were given the brief to develop a number of concepts, “The chosen concept of the E1 came from the idea that a secondary car; where the customer already owns a vehicle, and considering an eco-friendly alternative especially designed for short commute, with the capacity to carry 4 passengers, should be simple and take full advantage of the electric drive train. The limited top speed and range will create a lighter, more efficient vehicle, perfect for a second car. The design features a short overhang at both ends to create maximum capacity within the given wheelbase dimension. The side surface wraps around to the front and rear end, creating a sense of security and strength to the overall form. “, said Nakamura.

“The future of EV’s will be based around a number of game changing technologies”, says Mark Preston, ex-F1 designer, “I forsee a change in the way EV’s are perceived with lightweight carbon composites and vehicle dynamics technology such as torque vectoring driving exciting new areas of customer interest.  We created the research study in order to create a platform from which Formtech can develop these new technologies and provide solutions for all areas of EV development”.

The Formtech E1 forms the basis of further development studies by Formtech into the exciting new area of EV’s.  Further studies will be released from Formtech that follow up on the beginnings created with the E1.  “Formtech is committed to working towards the future and welcomes discussions with interested companies and investors from the green sector“, says Hilmer.

Randomness and Excitement – Part II

As a follow on to my blog last year where I discussed how randomness drives excitement in F1, the first few races of 2011 certainly provided some interesting racing with KERs, DRS and Pirelli providing a set of variables that the teams have not yet completely mastered.

However as I was watching the German GP recently I noticed how the number of different tyre strategies is starting to narrow.

It is inevitable that the engineers will eventually remove some of the biggest unknowns in tyre prediction.  It was interesting to hear Mark Webber comment that Sebastian had mastered the tyres more quickly than he had.  As the teams simulators start to match the reality of the track, drivers like Mark will be able to experiment back at base to coach themselves to make the best use of the tyres.  At this point the number of variables will again narrow reducing randomness in strategy.

In fact the German GP gave a few more ideas about how the teams might be combining the simulators with drivers and strategy software.  The first hint came when Alonso said over the radio that Webbers tyres were starting to drop off and requested an update of the strategy to reflect this change.  This shows that the teams models are starting to get quite accurate but they still need an empirical “trigger” or tipping point where the driver helps to recognise a change in the tyres that the engineers can use to re-correlate their models real-time.  Once this correlation has been done the strategies can be updated with more accurate information for predicting forward.

The cold track temperatures at the German GP seemed to favour the McLarens and they were able to predict the change point of the tyres for last stint to perfection.  If the tyre performance curve can be mapped accurately there should not be any benefit from what people are calling the “undercut” as this performance anomaly should be accounted for accurately in any strategy software: leading to no advantage or randomness.  Lets see how their models fair in the hotter temperatures in Hungary.

The DRS works in combination with the randomness generated by the tyres.  Theoretically if the fastest car leads from the front there should be no need for DRS.  But, as the tyres provide unpredictable performance variations on each car and with each driver the DRS allows cars to pass each other should one team/driver be lucky enough to find themselves with a different performance envelope in the race in comparison to qualifying.

Again, as the tyres become more understood the randomness of the race vs qualifying performances will become less and DRS will become less of an exciting tool.

Hopefully the tyres change at a faster rate than the teams can match with their understanding!